Close Encounters of the Fake & Capital Kind

It is 1.30 am on November 23, 2005. A thirty-eight year old man and his wife are traveling on a luxury bus from Hyderabad to Sangli, Maharashtra. A friend by the name of Tulsiram Prajapati is accompanying them. The bus driver is trying hard to stay awake, when a Qualis swerves in front of him. He brakes hard. Another car, a Tata Sumo, pulls up beside him. Five ATS officers dressed in plain clothes storm the bus. They tell the driver to stay calm, they are simply conducting a routine police check. The man is dragged out of the car. His wife screams, begging for his release while insisting that she remains with him. Both are taken away, along with Prajapati.

Within a few days the man is shot dead. He is labeled a terrorist, an agent for the LET, conspiring to kill political leaders including Narendra Modi. His name, Sohrabuddin, suitably fits the profile of a terrorist. The woman is alive for a few more days, after which she too is killed, her body burnt, her remains missing forever.

The friend is safe – for the moment. On December 28, 2006, a little over a year later, he too is shot dead. Police claim he was a member of the Sharif Pathan gang. In actuality, he was a witness to police terrorism.

It is now 2010. Rajkumar Pandiya, one of the IPS officers accused of killing Sohrabuddin, is brought to court for a bail plea hearing. Through his counsel, Ram Jethmalani, he says that he “should have been honoured and not hounded” for eliminating a notorious terrorist. He continues, somewhat ironically, Sohrabuddin may have been “killed in a fake encounter, but for that the process of law cannot be subverted.”

On the same day, another man is brought to court in Mumbai. He is accused of a similar charge. Shooting innocent civilians at a point blank range. His name is Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab – the lone surviving terrorist of the Mumbai attacks in 2008. It is yet to be decided whether he will be sentenced to death.

The similarity between the so-called protectors of the nation and the so-called enemies of the nation is uncanny. The point is there is always a justification. Always a few words which can make an action seem right. Whether it is a corrupt police officer staging an encounter, a young man with an ideology and an AK-47, or even a court of law sentencing a criminal on the basis of verifiable evidence, everyone has a reason.

Without going into the finer details of what is justice, I believe it is safe to say that there is no ‘honour’ in killing. If Ajmal Kasab can be sentenced to death for killing, I believe the Indian state is guilty of the same crime. Should the Indian state then be sentenced to the same punishment?

Share on Twitter

Ads4Good & Avanti Fellows

Perhaps it’s the driver’s kid – greeting you with an enthusiastic ‘Good Morning’ every time he sees you. Morning, noon and night. Or the jhadoo-pochcha waali shyly asking you if have an extra Class XII maths book lying around. For the eldest of her four daughters. Or the two foot rascal at the redlight who holds your car ransom with a dirty rag and a brilliant smile. You feign anger, asking him why he’s not in school. His smile widens and you can’t help but fall under it’s spell. You crossly relinquish a few coins, telling him he better start studying soon.

You’ve thought about it. Often enough. You may have even tried to do something about it. Gathered a few kids from the neighbourhood in on your front porch.

‘Let’s start at the very beginning,’ you say enthusiastically. ‘When you read you begin with A, B, C.’
‘A, B, C,’ a chorus of voices chant back.

The first day passes with great results. You are impossibly happy with the kids. They’re bright and full of potential. And you make a wonderful Julie Andrews. However, soon enough, the newness of it all wears out. The kids are still enthusiastic, but you tire to see that their progress is slow and at times painful. They are learning at different levels. You find it hard to manage them. One kid wants to draw. Another wants to play. One can read. Another can’t recognize the alphabets. You hate to say it but their enthusiasm irks you. Gradually, the frequency of the classes lessen. Till they entirely stop.

So where does that leave you? Incapable of ‘giving back’ to society despite wanting to? I don’t think so. Not all of us are born teachers. There are other ways you can help out. Read on:

1. Ads4Good.org: ‘Ads4Good is a unique initiative which allows everyone with a blog or a website to raise funds for their favorite cause for free.’ Basically, look at the ad at the bottom right side of this page. Instead of making $8.33 on Google AdSense in 3 years, I’m giving whatever money generated by clicks on the ad to Ads4Good in support of education. Akshay Surve, the very nice guy I met last year who gave birth to Ads4Good, sent me a mail yesterday saying that Ads4Good has made enough money in the short span of time its been running to send 12 kids to school for a year on a recurring basis (or to plant two hundred trees!)

If you want to add the widget to your site, just go the the Ads4Good  website.

2. Avanti Fellows: ‘Helps underprivileged students study at the best Indian Universities. We support our students with coaching for competitive exams, mentorship and financial aid through their high school and undergraduate education.’ Avanti Fellows was founded in 2009 by another Akshay (Akshay Saxena) and Krishna Ramkumar as well as other undergrad students from IIT Bombay. From what I gather, the main aim is to get kids admission into an IIT by offering financial support as well as mentorship by current students/alumni of IIT Bombay. It’s similar to Bihar’s Super 30 in it’s intent, but is more participative according to me. You can recommend a student for a fellowship, offer your support as a mentor or even give a donation. While this is a great idea, I would love to see a more self-sustaining financial solution (this usually my biggest problem with non-profits).

Anyway, I think these are two examples of a great idea being actualized. It’s awesome to see young people dedicate so much time and energy into things which can’t exactly be termed as lucrative.  Also, being the ‘creative-type’, I’d love to see similar support for the arts. Not everyone is born with a logical frame of mind. Not everyone can be an engineer. Some people are simply more visually inclined. I think it sucks that if you don’t have money to fall back on – you simply can’t pursue a career in the arts, be it writing, photography, design, fine arts, etc, etc.

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India: Reddy, Get Set, Mine!

Karnataka Tourism minister G Janardhan Reddy seems to be in a hole. His company – Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) – has been accused of illegal mining activities in Karnataka and across the border in Andhra.

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India: The Unfinished Koda Effect

Jharkhand has the most transformed politicians. Financially transformed, that is. TOI shows incomes of politicians such as Koda, Enos Ekka increasing dramatically after joining politics.

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India: The Headley Trail

American terror suspect David Coleman Headley is said to have visited the Osho Ashram in search of ‘soft targets’ in India. I know, this is a little mean. Ha!

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India: Crouching Obama, Leaping Dragon

Obama seems to be appeasing China on many fronts on his latest visit to Beijing. Apparently, he reiterates that ‘Tibet is a part of China’, China should play an important role in monitoring Indo-Pak relationships, and that US & China ‘ties have never been more important to our collective future.’

Could this possibly have anything to do with the $800 billion dollars that China holds in US treasury bills?

A shift in global power – Enter the not-so hidding dragon, bye bye crouching US tiger.

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India – Nov 17, 09

Second Edition of The Lines of India: The battle between Sachin Tendulkar and Bal Thackeray. Read the article from TOI below.

For those who haven’t read today’s newspaper, here’s the article straight from the Times of India.

MUMBAI/DELHI: Ageing Shiv Sena patriarch Bal Thackeray on Monday alienated himself from millions of Indians when he attacked the country’s icon and Maharashtra’s most loved son, Sachin Tendulkar, for saying that “Mumbai belonged to all Indians”. In an editorial in the Sena mouthpiece, Saamna, Thackeray, warned Sachin to “keep off the political pitch” for his own well-being. Or else, he would have “run out” from Marathi minds…. Read the rest at TOI.

Share on Twitter

The Lines of India

Was reading The Times of India today – and came to realise how utterly boring the news is. And how much more interesting RK Laxman is. So here is my RK Laxman inspired first edition of The Lines of India. Can’t decide what to call it. Almost daily editions will be coming up from tomorrow-  so watch out for this space!

Share on Twitter

No More Fear of the Dark

I came to Bangalore 6 months ago. To the northern suburb of Yelahanka to be precise. Yelahanka is a conservative place. My college, a design school, definitely isn’t. When conservatism collides with cosmopolitanism, a strange combustion happens. For  one, there is resentment from both sides. Secondly, categories  begin to collapse. Thirdly, a state of anarchy prevails before new categories are borne.

I’ll elaborate on these states in a later post. But right now I’m concerned about the state of anarchy that prevails as categories collapse.

Three women are walking home after eating dinner at 9pm. It isn’t late. It isn’t a long walk home. 7 minutes. It is, however, dark.

A man, a short man in a blue t-shirt, is walking a few metres ahead. Two women in front, one woman talking on her phone following some 5 metres behind. The man suddenly turns around and walks towards the girls. The women don’t react. They think maybe he’s forgotten something. The woman at the back doesn’t notice him. She’s on her phone. Suddenly, the man lunges towards the woman. Tries groping her breast, grabbing her breast. He’s on his feet. Yet he believes he has the abiltiy, the audacity, to attack a woman. A woman who is decently dressed. A woman who is not alone. A woman minding her own business.

The woman screams. Scared, the man begins to run away. The woman continues screaming, in shock. The shock is soon replaced by an understanding of what just happened. This is soon replaced by anger. She lets go of everything in her hands and chases the man.

They run. The man has a headstart. The woman is screaming as she runs down the street. It is a residential colony. There are houses on both sides. People hear her. People stare at her through their windows. The man turns around, thinking the woman must’ve given up by now. He’s shocked. She is still chasing him. He quickens his pace. His chappals break. He leaves them behind.

The woman reaches the end of the road. She is out of breath. She has no alternative but to stop. The man disappears into a park. He is free.

The women, and her friends, return to the spot where the man’s chappals are. They pick them up. They want to burn them in a public gathering. They want to humiliate the man who thinks he can fuck with a woman. They want to humiliate all the  men who believe they can assault a woman, who think it is their right to assault a woman.

The women hide in the bushes, waiting for the slightest chance that the man returns. He doesn’t. They head home. As they return, the conservative neighbours appear at their doorstep. Asking what happened. They are too scared to get directly involved. They suggest the women file a report with the police. The women hear them. But they know better. They have been harassed by the police before – why? For walking home at 2am. Because the night doesn’t belong to women.

For a conservative man to see a cosmopolitan woman, dressed in jeans, smoking, laughing, confidently walking alone at night must be a shock. His traditional idea of what a woman is suddenly jilted. His category has collapsed. He feels a certain sense of insecurity, the possibility that there is a shift in the order of the world. A shift in his world.

What can he do? Can he embrace this shift? Obviously not. Change, especially when it is a loss of power, is rarely appealing. His solution: the transference of fear.

He transfers his fear, his insecurity, into the women. By harassing them. By attacking them. By making them feel vulnerable. There is a certain element of cheap pleasure in touching, groping, a woman’s breast. But it is more than that. As the women grow fearful, they lose their power. They are less threatening. Power returns to the man. He is now strong once again. The man and his ego now have space to grow bigger.

The women have two alternatives. The first is what our mothers tell us – be scared. Be fearful. Stay home. Don’t go out at night. Don’t endanger yourself. They say it out of concern. They want us to be safe. But this is not a solution. It is a reaction, a reaction that encourages men to behave the man more animalistically.

The second alternative is more radical. A reverse transference of fear. Go out at night. Put yourself in danger. Use yourself as bait. With the help of friends, male or female, catch the bastards. Beat them up. Take their pictures, post them up on flyers. Send them to the police. Humiliate them. Make them scared. Make them believe that they don’t have the right. That they’re not stronger. That the night doesn’t belong to them.

Reclaim the night. Your night. No more fear of the dark.

Note: There have been a lot of reports of women being attacked in Bangalore recently. While it’s a new phenomena for the media, the women of my college have been experiencing this for atleast 2 years now. There  have been atleast 4-5 incidents a month, where women have been attacked, harassed, assaulted, by men on bikes or on foot. A vast majority of these women have moved away, to the city or to safer residential colonies. Running away is not a solution.

Share on Twitter

Chappals & Parks in the ‘Hanka

The Park

(Narrated in the voice of Mary Alice of Desperate Housewives)

Life in the suburbs can sometimes be boring (pan to quiet streets of SFS colony, Yelahanka). Especially for those who’ve just arrived from the hustle and bustle of city life (pan to Gabriel Solice, Namrata Mehta & Tanvi Srivastava). In these moments of quiet desperation, our neighbours can be our only support. Or not.

Welcome to happening world of Yelahanka. Where the neighbours hate us. (Pan to evil left-side Uncle neighbour with eviler bitey Bingo dog who didn’t let us use the terrace. Then pan to right side Aunty who was stricken by the “ce n’est pas une pipe, mais c’est un toilet” art work outside our house ).

When the neighbours fail us, the roommates device their own means of entertainment. And today, a jovial bet became an entertaining yet life altering moment for two Cemites.

Namrata Mehta, in her mistaken belief that the early bird catches the worm, sadistically woke up at 6.30 am to actually catch some worms in the park behind our house. She searched and searched, but alas, her search was futile. So instead, she thought to herself, let me run around in circles and try to make my morning a little more futile. So she ran and ran, for hours, for kilometres (she thought), till the sun rose high into the sky.

Meanwhile, Tanvi Srivastava happily slept and dreamt of pieces of wool named Sheep. She awoke to see a cheery Namrata Mehta ecstatically declare that she actually got up in the morning and ran. To sleepy to react, Tanvi Srivastava grunted.

(left) The Chappal and (right) The Floater from the perspective of the footwear

The day slowly passed by. CEMA came to an end and the topic of Namrata Mehta’s morning worm hunting exercise was broached once again. Guesses and calculations were made.

Namrata Mehta: I must’ve run 4 kms today.
Dharmang Prajapati: wahzzzzzzup.. stuff!
Tanvi Srivastava: Really?
Namrata Mehta: Yeahhhh.. I took 5 laps and that park must be atleast 800 metres. So 5×800=4kms
Tanvi Srivastava: What shit! It can’t be more than 300 metres. 5×300=1.5kms
Namrata Mehta: Fine, we’ll go home and measure it!

The Detailed and Empirical Process of Measuring the Perimeter of a Park in the Hanka

1. Take two subjects (a) Namrata Mehta and (b) Tanvi Srivastava
2. Make (a) wear chappals and (b) wear floaters
3. Tell them to count how many steps it takes to take a chakar of the park
4. Give them atleast 45 mins
5. Add an audience of staring people so that both (a) and (b) feel like idiots
6. Calculate length of chappal/floater
7. Measure by results of abovementioned 3

The Results of the Detailed and Empirical Process of Measuring the Perimeter of a Park in the Hanka

(a) Namrata Mehta: 1803 steps x 23 cms = 451 metres
(b) Tanvi Srivastava: 1815 steps x 29 cms = 523 metres

Final approximate perimeter of the park = 487 metres

Conclusion

That was the randomest thing to do!

Share on Twitter